Keep It Simple – Both for Marketers Explaining Marketing and Marketing to Your Customers

Karl Greenberg at Media Post’s Marketing Daily summarizes a talk Allen Adamson did at ANA. Below you will find excerpts from that talk below (to read the whole article click here).

Two things come up for me, one is this is so full of marketing jargon. Marketing savvy C-level executives will likely get this but even some of those might have to read this a couple of times. It isn’t that hard to understand but as I have been saying in previous posts, can’t we translate this into simpler terms?

Let’s take these statements:

"Segway's a good product, but not a strong brand for that reason”

“Best brands are blessed with both relevance and differentiation”

They make sense once you think about it, and in fact are VERY important statements. But I think they can be discussed in more straightforward way. This is the old argument of marketing needing marketing for itself.

What they mean with those statements is; deliver a great product that solves a clear problem. If one of those two things is not happening, you have a BIG marketing challenge on your hands.

The article is right on the money on a number of fronts.

· Don’t go big just because it is easy, like buying a big campaign because marketing is now the final solution to solve the bottom line problem. (Have you ever noticed how marketing is the first thing to cut then the last thing used to save the company?)

· Boil the value you are offering down to 2 – 3 simple words. This is good for customers but even better for employees who also represent your brand on a daily basis.

· Plan ahead and decide where you want to be (check back here tomorrow–Thursday– for a post describing a exercise right from my book how to do this)

· In order to do any of the above you must KNOW YOUR CUSTOMER and how your product will serve them.

Adamson At ANA: Best Brands Blessed With Relevance, Differentiation

by Karl Greenberg, Wednesday, Apr 25, 2007 5:00 AM ET

 ALLEN ADAMSON, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF the New York office of brand development consultancy Landor Associates, used the Segway personal transportation machine as an example of a brand that failed because it has a high degree of differentiation but very little relevance.

"Segway's a good product, but not a strong brand for that reason," he said.

The message was part of a conversation in the packed Manhattan Grand Hyatt convention hall on the benefits of simplicity in building a brand and why companies like Apple and Google or Timberland, for that matter, succeed by simplifying consumer choices and the brand's own proposition. "If the brand doesn't make it easy, it won't work."

Speaking at yesterday's Association of National Advertisers Conference, Adamson argued that a brand can be successful if that formula is reversed, but the best brands are blessed with both relevance and differentiation.

"The most common pattern we see is companies who have strong awareness, nonetheless continuously worried about awareness, who do things like get stadium-naming rights. They focus on that because it's easy to do," he said. "Dealing with the issue of differentiation and how to deliver it is complex and hard to execute."

The problem, he said, is that few companies are able to boil down their brand and what makes it different to a few simple words. "We'll sit down with a CEO and ask what the company does that's different, and we may get something like 'innovation.' That's a popular word these days. When we speak to the executive board of that company and ask them what innovation means, we'll get twelve different answers."

He said developing the brand's identity in simple terms and then creating a symbol and/or a compelling phrase defining it is critical not just for consumers but for employees, too--because it is clear and unambiguous, and therefore a kind of "veni, vidi, vici" for company workers, particularly those who deal with consumers.

"Once you get to where your story is, you need then to get it simple, if you can't get it down to simple idea it won't stick," he said. "If you have a brand promise, and you have dozens or hundreds who are supposed to be delivering that promise, you will never succeed ... if there's no clear, simple sense of what the customer journey is."

Examples of successful brand ideas: BP's "Beyond Petroleum" mantra; H.R. Block's "Friendly enabler" positioning. "You need to deliver that promise along consumer touchpoints, but the most successful brands choose their touch points carefully," he said. "Figure out where you want to win, and make sure you do that."

He said a simple and clear brand premise--one that argues that a brand is different from its competitors--starts with something that isn't fulfilled by what's out there already. "I always think that Jerry Seinfeld would be great at branding because he always asks the question, 'Do you ever wonder why?' You have to get to the 'ever wonder why' phrase," he said.

As an example, he illustrated how Timberland's rise from no-name boot brand to fashion accessory and one of the best-known work boot brands came from an observation by CEO Jeff Swartz.

"He bought a shoe company in Maine, was doing pretty well--some years were good, some bad, but he couldn't grow the business. One day he got out of a car, stepped in a puddle and said, "Why can't I do a waterproof shoe?' The company designed it, came up with the name Timberland."

Adamson also gave a nod to Bose headphones, Baby Einstein and FedEx (with its brand premise of absolute certainty) as companies that are successfully tapping a core consumer insight. And Mazda.

Karl Greenberg can be reached at karl@mediapost.com

Read the rest of the article

Comments

[Chris Brown]

Jennifer:
You inspired me with your blog post yesterday and I've linked to your post this morning.

Thanks for the inspiration!
Chris Brown
Branding & Marketing blog
brandandmarket.blogspot.com